In the Beginning was the Word, and the Word was gone…?

Lost in Translation

books1So I was reading the New Testament in Tetum, the language of East Timor. I started to discover some interesting things that happen in translation. I thought I would blog about them, both to make notes, and to aid my fledgling comprehension of Tetum.

The Tetum New Testament I am reading is this one: The Holy Bible in tetum
New Testament


Was the Word actually God?

One of the passages of Scripture famously argued over is at the beginning of John’s Gospel, which reads, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” – John 1:1

Some would argue that the last clause, “and the Word was God”, should be translated “and the Word was a god”, because the word for God lacks the definite article in the original Greek (“καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος”, lit “and God was the word”).

Colwell’s Rule is a grammar rule in Greek which observes that a noun which comes before a verb may have the definite article omitted. In this case the verb is “ἦν”, translated “was”. The noun, “θεὸς”, meaning God (or “a god”) comes before the verb. It is therefore technically ambiguous whether the writer meant “God”, or “a god”.

In the context of John’s Gospel, however, it becomes quite clear that his intention was very much to convey the idea that this “word” is in fact Jesus, and that Jesus is in fact God, in some meaningful way. It takes the entire Gospel to express that meaningful way.

The Tetum omission

Given that this phrase is one of the most hotly debated in the entire Bible, how odd to find it completely missing in the Tetum!

Let me employ my inexpert translation skills to translate the Tetum of John 1:1 (“Joao” 1:1).

Houri uluk kedas liafuan iha nanis; liafuan horik nanis ho Maromak.

Literally, this says something like:

Houri Since
uluk before
kedas immediately / at once
liafuan word
iha is
nanis previously
liafuan word
horik dwell
nanis previously
ho with
maromak God

 

… and that’s it! Then we’re on to verse 2…

So what is the translator trying to say? Is there some nuance in Tetum of which I am unaware, which would imply from these two phrases that the third is true? If so, does the translator assume that the original said, “and the Word was God”, or “and the Word was a god”?

 

facebook comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *