Kevin Bennett

Join in the conversation!

Here is the place where you can pose a question, propose an answer to someone else’s question, or discuss other people’s answers. If someone answers your question well, be sure to “Select” the best answer.

… and also make sure to up-vote questions and answers that you find helpful.

Kevin Bennett
87 Rep. 4 Answers 0 Questions 0 Followers 0 Following 1118 Comments

Stats

  • 4 answers, 2 selected
  • 0 questions, 0 solved
  • Member for 7 years, 20 days
  • 3392 profile views
  • Last seen March 22, 2019

Reputation

Total 87
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
+1
January 26, 2018 Commented Hi Saji, Thank you for taking the time to comment! I see that you're saying the believer is not a son by birth, but by adoption instead. How do you reconcile that with such ideas as these?
But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become sons of God, born, not of blood or of the will of the flesh or of the will of a husband, but born of God.
- John 1:12-13
Amen, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit. What is born of the flesh is flesh, and what is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not be astonished that I said to you, ‘You must be born from above.’
- John 3:5 ... and so many others. Where scripture is explicit, we are obliged to accept what it says. Where it is ambiguous, then we can start wondering. Scripture is absolutely explicit that nobody can be part of the Age to Come without being born into the family of God. But scripture is less clear about "υἱοθεσία" (usually translated "adoption", but it probably should not be) - a word used only by one author in the Bible, and used in a way that if it was intended to mean what you suggest, it would contradict Jesus' own words. So I would suggest that the inspired writer cannot possibly have meant what you are suggesting. If he did it would mean he was saying the opposite of what Jesus said, and that is not what Paul does. So what we must do is attempt to learn what Paul did mean by υἱοθεσία. As I say in the article, I suggest it is a reference to inheritance. More specifically, coming into an inheritance.

Votes

3 votes received 100/100 3up 0down
4 votes casted 100/100 4up 0down

Top Answers

Question and answer is powered by AnsPress